|
CELL TOWER
ORDINANCE AMENDMENT
Visser stated he
is concerned that the new height limit of 160ft. doesn’t accommodate
many residents or carriers.
Monica Arendshorst
– 1653 S. Shore Dr. – Chairperson of the Cell Tower Subcommittee stated
there were not many changes in the height ordinance but is firmly
grounded in the Master Plan. She stated they really focused on a
balance between the aesthetics in the environment and service to the
residents. The new ordinance gives incentives to monopoles.
Ebihara
recommended referencing the Friar’s Guide or the FCC database regarding
information on existing telecommunications activity in other areas of
the state.
Docter referenced
the recommendations by Mr. Mark Kooyers of Tele-Rad Inc. – 354 N.
Lakeshore Dr. – regarding the requirements of the FAA, MDOT, the DNR and
public safety preferences.
Mike Toscano –
1228 Oak Hampton – resident, also on the Planning Commission and the
Cell Tower Sub-committee stated that the updated ordinance raises the
height. The previous height was 150 ft. The towers must go in C2 areas
and there are many requirements in the ordinance on preservation of
environmental views. He has driven around to other townships and seen
their cell poles and feels they blend in nicely. He also suggested a
joint Planning Commission formed by planning commission members of many
local units of government to decide how to best service this area with
wireless communication.
MOTION MADE;
MOTION SUPPORTED: A motion was made by Price and supported by Ebihara
to recommend the ordinance as presented.
Dreyer asked why
the Planning Commission recommended only C2 areas. In this community,
which is highly residential, we may be limiting our coverage. He also
felt the height should be the full 200ft. to get better service in the
rural areas of the township. He also questioned the amount of feet
(600) provided for the setback.
Ebiahra clarified
that the taller the structure (monopole or lattice) the more carriers
will be able to provide service on the tower. If there is a 120ft pole
only one carrier will be able to provide service.
Ebihara would like
the Planning Commission reconsider the color preferences. It becomes a
maintenance issue to repaint the tower frequently.
MOTION MADE;
MOTION SUPPORTED; MOTION CARRIED: A motion was made by Price and
supported by Ebihara to withdraw the previous motion based on concerns
presented by the board.
VanIwaarden stated
that there is enough concern with the proposed ordinance that it should
be sent back to the Planning Commission.
MOTION MADE;
MOTION SUPPORTED; MOTION CARRIED: A motion was made by Docter and
supported by Dreyer to send the ordinance back to the Planning
Commission for further revision.
Visser stated the
planning Commission should consider the height, setback limits, and
finish in the revision of the ordinance.
Price stated she
supports a monopole.
VanIwaarden stated
he would like to see an increase in the height limitation and in turn
increase carriers.
The board agreed
they would rather see a few tall structures than many short ones around
the township.
Docter suggested
we include a member of the Ottawa County Central Dispatch on the
ordinance sub-committee.
Visser stated he
is on Central Dispatch and may be able to help find an operations
representative to serve on the sub-committee.
Price will bring
information about making communications an area wide prospect as
suggested by Mr. Toscano to the MACC for discussion.
Ebihara stated the
township should encourage this type of service because many people work
out of their homes and it would be a good service to the community.
Docter recommended
the sub-committee revise the ordinance making the height limit at least
200ft or follow requirements by the FAA if it is located within a flight
path.
Ebihara stated
that the township look at the assessment values of the property these
structures are on. They are considered real property and can be taxed.
Steggerda
recommended the Planning Commission receive a copy of the e-mail from
Mr. Kooyers of Tele-Rad Inc. |